[Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9

[Kapil Thangavelu]

its good for specific application deployments, as intimately tied to the  
appserver its bad, since it dictates deployment requirements to have a xul  
capable client, ie. non standard, defacto or otherwise.

-kapil

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:26:30 -0800, Fabrice Monaco  
<fmonaco at cirb.irisnet.be> wrote:

> For the backend (manage) this isn't problem. i have just one suggestion
> FireFox+xul+Zope is good ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Withers [mailto:chris at simplistix.co.uk]
> Sent: mardi 6 décembre 2005 16:07
> To: srichter at cosmos.phy.tufts.edu
> Cc: zope3-dev at zope.org; Fabrice Monaco
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9
>
>
> Stephan Richter wrote:
>> On Tuesday 06 December 2005 09:44, Fabrice Monaco wrote:
>>
>>> Why not XUL?
>>
>> Because it sucks and is browser-specific.
>
> Be careful, or you'll have Paul in tears ;-)
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
>             - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope3-dev mailing list
> Zope3-dev at zope.org
> Unsub:  
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/hazmat%40objectrealms.net
>



--