[Zope3-dev] Certification: Supporting
"Residual InformationProtection" in Zope 3
Christian Theune
ct at gocept.com
Fri Dec 16 07:11:35 EST 2005
Am Freitag, den 16.12.2005, 12:52 +0100 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
> Roger Ineichen wrote:
> [Christian]
> >> Otherwise this function is likely to become a performance killer, as
> >> I'd have to go all over the place to remove stuff.
> >
> > We do this everytime we delete a object. This is done with subscribers
> > and dispatching events to sublocations if a ObjectRemoveEvent get fired.
>
> Wouldn't this still be a performance killer? I.e. if a user gets removed
> in a large site, wouldn't an event need to be sent to all objects that
> have security annotations in the tree? And at the end, a large
> transaction, or a lot of transactions, would need to be committed. From
> my experience with Zope 2, this sounds like a potentially very expensive
> operation, right?
Right.
--
gocept gmbh & co. kg - schalaunische str. 6 - 06366 koethen - germany
www.gocept.com - ct at gocept.com - phone +49 3496 30 99 112 -
fax +49 3496 30 99 118 - zope and plone consulting and development
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/attachments/20051216/64072b0a/attachment.bin
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list