[Zope3-dev] RFC: zcml:condition
Dieter Maurer
dieter at handshake.de
Fri Feb 18 14:35:18 EST 2005
Jim Fulton wrote at 2005-2-18 06:24 -0500:
> ...
>> Why the choice to make the verb be part of the attribute value, instead
>> of having the verb *be* the attribute? i.e. you could have
>>
>> zcml:feature
>>
>> or zcml:hasfeature or zcml:iffeature
>>
>> or something along those lines.
>
>Because I think the idea of a general condition is
>easier to understand than a number of similar features.
+1
Blanks are useful to improve readability.
Verbs are useful to improve understanding.
--
Dieter
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list