[Zope3-dev] RFC: zcml:condition

Dieter Maurer dieter at handshake.de
Fri Feb 18 14:35:18 EST 2005


Jim Fulton wrote at 2005-2-18 06:24 -0500:
> ...
>> Why the choice to make the verb be part of the attribute value, instead 
>> of having the verb *be* the attribute? i.e. you could have
>> 
>> zcml:feature
>> 
>> or zcml:hasfeature or zcml:iffeature
>> 
>> or something along those lines.
>
>Because I think the idea of a general condition is
>easier to understand than a number of similar features.

+1

Blanks are useful to improve readability.

Verbs are useful to improve understanding.

-- 
Dieter


More information about the Zope3-dev mailing list