[Zope3-dev] Missing ObjectContentModifiedEvent
Garrett Smith
garrett at mojave-corp.com
Wed Jun 1 11:14:07 EDT 2005
Garrett Smith wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Garrett Smith wrote:
>>> :-) I guess this approach is *so* endemic to Zope 3, I must be
>>> missing something huge.
>>
>> What we're talking about is not very different from the way that
>> composition is used to prevent explosition of field types.
>>
>> For example, we use: List(Int()) rather than IntegerList.
>>
>> Note that we use a combination of type and composition,
>> hopefully striking a good balence.
>
> I see your point.
>
> But events are essentially an API and a well defined contract is
> better than an implicit one. I think we're going to see a lot code
> that looks like this:
>
> if not 'my stuff' in event.extra:
> return
> doSomething()
I take this back -- we can always provide a multi-adapter delegator.
That's actually pretty nice.
> I also think this is being driven by the "I can imagine..." syndrome.
I'm still concerned about WHUI. What in the core can be replaced with
this new model?
-- Garrett
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list