[Zope3-dev] Re: zope3 website report?

[Benji York]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> b) It is exactly the opposite of what we've been trying to do for the
>  last couple of months: convergence, not divergence!

I think that differentiating Zope 3 from Zope 2 is a good thing.

> If we want Zope 3 and its Component Architecture to be recognized by
> people, it needs to be a first class citizen on zope.org, not some
> separate site.

Nothing says that zope3.org can't be prominently displayed on zope.org.

> Why? Because Zope 2 will soon incorporate lots of Zope 3 technology
> (it already does incorporate some),

I would posit that there are *many* non-Zope 2 users, and that is a
group we need to attract.  Too closely associating Zope 2 and Zope 3 
will only inhibit that.

> making it all look like two separate worlds is far from reality.

I'm more interested in promoting Zope 3 than having web site structure
reflect reality.
-- 
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation