[Zope3-dev] Re: RFC: Rename "principal" to "participant"
Steve Alexander
steve at canonical.com
Wed Sep 14 09:05:50 EDT 2005
> Interesting. It looks to me like you're calling a User object what the
> CMF calls a Member.
Sure. Does the CMF have any users who aren't members?
> Would you say that the existence of such a concept
> in PAU should make principal annotation a unnecessary, if not even
> deprecated?
I don't really see the point of principal annotation as a special thing.
Being able to annotate things is good. I'm not sure principals should
be a special case either way. Can you annotate permissions?
I don't think systems should be built relying on being able to annotate
principals. That sounds kind of implicit. I'd rather see a first class
User concept.
--
Steve Alexander
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list