[Zope3-dev] Re: Need to get more involved in Web SIG (was Re: Fixing ZServer bugs?)

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Tue Dec 19 15:53:46 EST 2006


Hey,

Tres Seaver wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:

[snip]
>> If we find that WSGI is inferior to the Zope 2 server, then I certainly
>> think that abandoning our various Zope 3 efforts is a reasonable
>> alternative, although unattractive, since I'm not aware of anyone
>> actively maintaining the Zope 2 server. I'd much rather
>> leverage a larger effort.
> 
> There *isn't* a larger effort that I know of: the spec allows for
> interop, but we need somebody to care for the other end of the pipe.

What larger effort are we looking for here? I mean, there are plenty of 
WSGI server implementations around:

http://www.wsgi.org/wsgi/Servers

It may be that none of these is suitable for our purposes, but it seems 
to be an active area of development. That by itself makes it attractive.

I myself hooked Zope up to the CherryPy WSGI server before. I haven't 
spent any time yet to figure out whether that works well. I do know that 
the CherryPy people spent quite a bit of time getting their WSGI server 
up to speed.

Regards,

Martijn



More information about the Zope3-dev mailing list