[Zope3-dev] Re: ZCML bad ;-)
Shane Hathaway
shane at hathawaymix.org
Tue Jan 24 12:22:16 EST 2006
Fred Drake wrote:
> On 1/24/06, Chris Withers <chris at simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>
>>>Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
>
>
> Are you sure?
>
> Perhaps it's reasonable to use a single namespace for all the ZCML
> directives defined as part of the Zope 3 release.
Agreed. Let's just do that.
> What about
> third-party directives? Are you saying we don't need to worry about
> introducing names that conflict with third-party names we don't know
> about?
>
> That sounds short-sighted to me. We've certainly defined several
> directives here at ZC, and I'd hate to have to push them all into Zope
> 3 itself just to ensure we don't end up with name conflicts in the
> future.
Separate namespaces for separate business entities makes sense to me.
What doesn't make sense to me is having separate namespaces for every
subsystem, which is too deep a hierarchy.
Shane
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list