[Zope3-dev] Re: registerUtility(component, interface) vs provideUtility(interface, component) vs provideUtility(component, interface)

[Christian Theune]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Christian Theune wrote:
>>>> Isn't the global site manager something else then zope.component?
>>> No. The global site manager (we prefer to call it global component
>>> registry nowadays) is defined in zope.component. It is always htere.
>>>
>>>> Because zope.component uses the current thread-local site-manager,
>>>> depending on what was set during traversal etc., isn't it?
>>> Nope. zope.component knows nothing about thread-local site managers.
>>> That's zope.app.component (which hooks its knowledge of thread-local
>>> site managers into zope.component).
>>
>> So why does zope.component.getUtility return local utilities then?
> 
> Lol, do I have to write everything twice?
> 
> Last sentence, in the parentheses:
> 
>   "zope.app.component hooks its knowledge of thread-local site managers
>   into zope.component"
> 
> Basically, look at zope.app.component.hooks, especially setHooks. Unless
> setHooks is actually executed, zope.component knows NOTHING about local
> utilities.

LOL. Man. I have to check my eyes ...

I better re-read that whole thread.

- --
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - ct at gocept.com - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE+awZdUt9X/gknwIRAsCQAKDISeSCIdQXw2b+bskq/khy9ZVtPgCgsqv/
z698rDtXM0mWGcZY/F2Mh7o=
=0S6v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----