[Zope3-dev] Re: registerUtility(component, interface) vs provideUtility(interface, component) vs provideUtility(component, interface)

[Stephan Richter]

On Tuesday 05 September 2006 07:55, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > The order of arguments is the same. I think Jim wants the  
> > convenience functions in zope.component (provide*) to go away in  
> > favor of the explicit spelling through the global site manager. I  
> > think that before we do that, we should first abolish the term  
> > "site manager" from the zope.component API (because we don't call  
> > it site manager anymore).
>
> Yup.

Since we are at it, I would love to have z3c.baseregistry in the core for Zope 
3.4. Jim, I would like you to review it  It is a pretty small package, so it 
should not take long.

As a side note: I noticed the difficulty of writing about the "components 
registry" or just "components". I think this is somewhat facilitated by the 
fact that the module is called "*registry.py" and the classes "*Components".

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training