[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

[Philipp von Weitershausen]

Chris Withers wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> Because it's clutter.
> 
> I call BS on that :-S
> 
>> And because there should preferrably be only one way to do things.
> 
> Indeed, but why break existing code unnecessarilly?

Call it "BS" or "unnecessary". The reason why I think breaking existing 
code *eventually* is a good thing is still quoted here:

>> Theuni was recently very confused about the difference between three 
>> different APIs that do exactly the same thing (registering a utility). 
>> If we had deprecated at least the most confusing one of them (ztapi) 
>> already, it would probably have been much clearer.
> 
> Yeah, I see your point, but I agree with Jim's later in this thread ;-)

I don't think my point and Jim's are exclusive. In fact, I agree with Jim.