[Zope3-dev] Re: A thought on backward compatibility and minimum
versions
Jim Fulton
jim at zope.com
Thu May 31 15:56:07 EDT 2007
On May 31, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> Combined with the fact that that great majority of packages don't
>>> change very much after they have become stable, I think most
>>> package dependencies could be expressed very simply if there was
>>> a simple syntax to specify *just* the major version. In the
>>> context of setuptools, I think "*" could be used, as has been
>>> suggested, but without leading =s. So, to specify foo version 2,
>>> I think the following syntax would be very reasonable:
>>>
>>> foo 2*
>> Why can't this be foo >2 ?
>
> Nevermind, I shot too fast. I realize that "foo 2*" *only* wants
> foo 2.x and not 3.x... So, in my suggested spelling, I would write
> it as
>
> foo 2.>=0
>
> I wouldn't mind shorting that to
>
> foo 2.*
>
> though
I'd like to go even farther to: "foo 2".
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list