[Zope3-Users] Re: Conflicting configuration actions for protectName
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Wed Sep 20 16:57:57 EDT 2006
Rob Campbell wrote:
> Ok, that's what I thought. How can I fix the problem?
(Yeah, I know, I could read your original post now but I think you'll be
able to figure it out by youself now. You'll just have to work with the
fact that contains() adds a __setitem__ declaration to your interface.)
> I think I can create an IFosterSourceContainer interface and have the
> constraint there. Then I would have to implement that interface for
> FosterRecord. Would that work? Also, is there any other/better way to
> do it?
*Usually* we only deal with contains() within IContainer-derived
interfaces anyway. That doesn't mean you have to go and implement
More information about the Zope3-users