Zope-Dev November 2011

zope-dev@zope.dev

33 participants
62 discussions

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 3, OK: 45
by Tres Seaver 07 Nov '11

07 Nov '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/07/2011 07:24 AM, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Monday, November 07, 2011 07:08:20 AM Tres Seaver wrote: >>> [3] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 >>> >>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052265.ht >>> >>> ml >> Same as it ever was: who was it again who feels responsible for >> maintenance on z3c.form? > > I am maintaining z3c.form, just not the Windows release, since I > have (a) no suitable setup and (b) really no interest to do so. OK, cool. The test failure here doesn't appear to be related to Windows (I think Hanno pinned lxml to work around earlier failutres) http://winbot.zope.org/builders/z3c.form_py_265_32/builds/334/steps/test/lo… Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk63z8QACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4vqwCdEdEaXMeX+z9v3VYI1vVCGxy7 4f8AoKaSbBe545xtg0VtLhgvg2iEzXat =bfYj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

zope-tests - FAILED: 3, OK: 45
by Zope tests summarizer 07 Nov '11

07 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-05 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-06 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] Total languishing bugs for zope2: 4 ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [2] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [3] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zope2: 4 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052262.html [2] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052267.html [3] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052265.html

2 1

ZEO client cache not working properly with beforestorage
by Malthe Borch 07 Nov '11

07 Nov '11

If I set my beforestorage to a reasonably current time, e.g. "now", I expect to get reasonably good performance from a ZEO client cache. Instead, I find that beforestorage: 1) asks the cache to ``loadBefore``; 2) but that method only looks for "noncurrent" entries; 3) meanwhile, my cache only has "current" records. I'm not sure if the problem is that the cache shouldn't be setting the loaded oids as "current", or if the ``loadBefore`` method should also accept (some) "current" entries. \malthe

2 4

Zope 4 - San Francisco sprint and beyond
by Hanno Schlichting 07 Nov '11

07 Nov '11

Hi. A couple of us came together before the Plone conference to work on various Zope related topics. We worked on the following areas: - storing parent pointers (elro, davisagli): we have a branch of Zope that changes OFS to store parent pointers and fixed the issues that arose in copy/cut/paste and zexp export code. There's an issue remaining with Acquisition, where we lost some protection against cycle protection - I continue working on this. - catalog using intids (rossp): we have branches of Zope, ZCatalog and CMF which change the catalog to use intids as their internal uid and rid. This needs more testing, but looks very promising. Currently it uses plone.app.intid / five.intid to maintain an intid to physical path mapping. Once the parent pointer work is stable, we can stop doing this and load objects directly from the database connection - Chameleon (chaoflow): Florian worked on making Zope use Chameleon by default. This works for the most parts, but there's some problems left in tests, as Chameleon wants an utility to be registered but a lot of tests in Zope and CMF don't use ZCML test layers. - Traversal simplification: Mikko worked on researching traversal and options to simplify it. The first idea was to unify some of the code used for URL, path and path expression traversal to bring those more in line. Not sure how far he got ;) - WebOb (garbas): Rok worked on bringing in WebOb as an underpinning for the request/response objects and making both API's available at the same time. I think the request is done and a good deal of the response works. Doing this means we can deprecate parts of the old request API and encourage the use of the more standard WebOb API. - WSGI (matthewwilkes, hannosch): We fixed the bugs that had been reported about using the current WSGI support (mod_wsgi problems, forced dependency on repoze.who) on trunk and the 2.13 branch. Afterwards Matthew continued on a branch to remove the ZServer/medusa from Zope and leave only the WSGI publisher in place. We had a bunch of other ideas on what to do, like allowing Unicode ids in OFS, working on security and similar large topics. I hope I haven't forgotten anyone. Most of the code currently lives in branches or forks on https://github.com/zopefoundation. We haven't figured out yet how to proceed with that. In terms of copyright all committers to the GitHub repository have signed Zope contributor agreements already, so there's no imminent legal problem. Which of these branches should make it into Zope and for which release is completely open and is going to be up for discussion. On a personal note, I won't be available as the release manager for the next Zope 4 release - as originally outlined in my mail from 2010 (https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2010-March/039880.html). I'll continue to take care of the maintenance releases for the 2.12 and 2.13 series. At least unless someone else shows an interest in picking up this work. Should there be anyone interested in this position, speak up on this mailing list. Once someone has been found, I'll make sure the person gets documentation and access to all relevant resources. Hanno

2 1

zope-tests - FAILED: 3, OK: 46
by Zope tests summarizer 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-04 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-05 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [1] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 [2] winbot / zope.app.debug_py_265_32 [3] winbot / zope.generations_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052215.html [2] FAILED winbot / zope.app.debug_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052216.html [3] FAILED winbot / zope.generations_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052217.html

2 1

zope-tests - FAILED: 1, OK: 46
by Zope tests summarizer 05 Nov '11

05 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-03 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-04 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [1] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052168.html

2 1

zope-tests - FAILED: 8, OK: 40
by Zope tests summarizer 04 Nov '11

04 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-02 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-03 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [1] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [2] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [3] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit [4] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [5] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [6] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [7] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 [8] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052113.html [2] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052112.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052111.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052128.html [5] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052127.html [6] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052126.html [7] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052143.html [8] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052120.html

2 1

zope-tests - FAILED: 8, OK: 31
by Zope tests summarizer 03 Nov '11

03 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-01 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-02 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [2] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [3] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [4] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit [5] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [6] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [7] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [8] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052076.html [2] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052075.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052074.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052073.html [5] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052088.html [6] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052089.html [7] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052087.html [8] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052080.html

3 4

zope-tests - FAILED: 14, OK: 33
by Zope tests summarizer 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-10-31 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-01 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit [2] ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [3] ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [4] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit [5] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [6] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit [7] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [8] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [9] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux [10] Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [11] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 [12] winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 [13] winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 [14] winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052029.html [2] FAILED ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052031.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052030.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052044.html [5] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052046.html [6] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052045.html [7] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052042.html [8] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052041.html [9] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052040.html [10] FAILED Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052032.html [11] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052034.html [12] FAILED winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052061.html [13] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052059.html [14] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052060.html

2 2

zope.testbrowser release?
by Wolfgang Schnerring 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

Hello, I've added an assertion helper to zope.testbrowser that provides ``assertEllipsis``, which is very helpful when using Testbrowser with unittest.TestCase (instead of doctests). Some examples: self.assertEllipsis('...bar...', 'foo bar qux') # -> nothing happens self.assertEllipsis('foo', 'bar') # -> AssertionError: Differences (ndiff with -expected +actual): - foo + bar self.assertNotEllipsis('foo', 'foo') # -> AssertionError: "Value unexpectedly matches expression 'foo'." For convenience, if no ``actual`` value is provided, ``self.browser.contents`` is used. I'd like to cut a release of zope.testbrowser, if nobody has any objections against my doing so. There are also unreleased changelog entries about handleErrors and WSGI, which look fine to me. Wolfgang -- Wolfgang Schnerring · ws(a)gocept.com · software development gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 219401 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Python, Pyramid, Plone, Zope - consulting, development, hosting

2 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Zope-Dev November 2011