[Grok-dev] Re: grok.subscribe() typo in developers notes?
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Mon Jun 16 12:11:05 EDT 2008
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> Danny Navarro wrote:
>>> While going through the developers notes I found that there were some
>>> code samples where grok.subscribe() is used as a normal function not
>>> as a decorator. I think the @ for decorator is missing.
>> Indeed. Is this document maintained on the website or in SVN? Can
>> somebody please fix this?
> It's maintained in SVN, soon to be published on the web using our Sphinx
> infrastructure (right? :). I've just fixed the missing @ (I only found
> one example).
There was another one which I just fixed. From the commit log I saw that
the file was called grok_overview.rst, on the website it's available
under "Developer Notes". Can we rename the file to developer-notes.rst
or something like that to match its title on the website? (I was looking
for this file in SVN but didn't find it because of this.)
More information about the Grok-dev