[Grok-dev] Re: grok.subscribe() typo in developers notes?
faassen at startifact.com
Mon Jun 16 11:04:46 EDT 2008
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Danny Navarro wrote:
>> While going through the developers notes I found that there were some
>> code samples where grok.subscribe() is used as a normal function not
>> as a decorator. I think the @ for decorator is missing.
> Indeed. Is this document maintained on the website or in SVN? Can
> somebody please fix this?
It's maintained in SVN, soon to be published on the web using our Sphinx
infrastructure (right? :). I've just fixed the missing @ (I only found
More information about the Grok-dev