[Grok-dev] Re: grok.subscribe() typo in developers notes?

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Mon Jun 16 11:04:46 EDT 2008

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Danny Navarro wrote:
>> While going through the developers notes I found that there were some 
>> code samples where grok.subscribe() is used as a normal function not 
>> as a decorator. I think the @ for decorator is missing.
> Indeed. Is this document maintained on the website or in SVN? Can 
> somebody please fix this?

It's maintained in SVN, soon to be published on the web using our Sphinx 
infrastructure (right? :). I've just fixed the missing @ (I only found 
one example).



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list