[ZODB-Dev] PROPOSAL: Explicit transactions for ZODB4

[Shane Hathaway]

Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Recently, Shane Hathaway created a "local transaction" capability for 
> ZODB, and Jeremy Hylton added transaction "suspend() and resume()" 
> capabilities for ZODB4.
> 
> Both facilities effectively exist to work around the default 
> "transaction per thread" model of ZODB.  I would like to propose taking 
> these ideas to their logical conclusion: replacing the current implicit 
> choice of transaction, with simple, explicit transaction management.

+1

I see the local transaction capability as a prototype for better 
transaction management.

Shane