[ZODB-Dev] PersistentMapping good for large numbers of objects?

[Toby Dickenson]

On Thursday 17 July 2003 15:42, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> What I was thinking about is to use an OOBTree instead of a
> PersistentMapping in a user folder implementation.
>
> So, getUserNames() would effectively mean mybtree.keys()...

How often does getUserNames get called? I guess not often - so dont worry. 

> Oh well, so much about drop-in scalability. The *real* solution for this
> scenario seems to be LDAP anyway. ;-)

You could implement a great LDAP server using a btree ;-)

-- 
Toby Dickenson - http://www.geminidataloggers.com/people/tdickenson

Would you like my job? http://www.geminidataloggers.com/jobs for Software
Engineering jobs at Gemini Data Loggers in Chichester, West Sussex, England