On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 17:21, Jim Fulton wrote: > How would y'all feel about: > > z.odb > z.transaction > z.persistent > > with ZODB temporarily remaining as an alias for z.zodb and Persistence > remaining for backward compatability, as you suggest. We would > deprecate both of these packages. z.odb or z.zodb? (I'd prefer the latter.) -Barry