[ZODB-Dev] Re: Anybody using ZODB with no calls to fsync in production?

[Chris Withers]

David Binger wrote:
> This is an interesting point, and it makes me wonder if
> there would be interest having the fsync behavior vary on
> a per-transaction basis instead of a per-storage basis.
> Maybe the client submitting transactions that are just
> Session-like changes could include a message to the server
> indicating that this transaction is not precious.

Nah, too subtle/fragile/complicated...

...that's my gut feel anyway.

I really like the proposal as it stands though :-)

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk