[ZODB-Dev] Re: record_iternext API is broken

[Stephan Richter]

On Tuesday 24 April 2007 19:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I should have noted that this API isn't widely used AFAIK, so it  
> probably wouldn't be that big a deal to change it.  Personally, I'd  
> be inclined to change it to return oid, version, and next (or oid and  
> next).  Client code could always call load to get the transaction id  
> and data.
>
> Thoughts?

I am using it for generation scripts quiet frequently. But if the API becomes 
better, I am more than willing to change those occurences. :-)

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training