[ZODB-Dev] anecdotal speed comparison with RelStorage

Chris Withers chris at simplistix.co.uk
Wed Mar 26 13:17:55 EDT 2008


Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> FileStorage-over-ZEO managed the test in 3 mins 20 seconds
>>
>> Relatorage-to-Oracle managed the test in 3 mins 18 seconds
> 
> Cool, although it's not clear the storage speed had a major impact.

Well, the point was that RelStorage-to-Oracle was of similar speed to 
FileStorage-over-ZEO, meaning there are no performance reasons not to 
head for the former.

> Oracle win. ;)  I've seen evidence that RelStorage on MySQL even has a 
> chance of beating plain FileStorage in performance.

Cool :-)

>> I'd be really interested to try some tests with multiple ZEO clients 
>> attached to a FileStorage versus multiple RelStorage client attached 
>> to Oracle. I suspect Oracle would win ;-)
> 
> I am certainly interested in hearing the results of that test.

This might happen tomorrow, we'll see...

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk


More information about the ZODB-Dev mailing list