[Zope3-dev] Zope Package (Directory) Structure Reorganization
Lalo Martins
lalo@laranja.org
Sat, 13 Apr 2002 00:28:16 -0300
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:07:31PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
> >>>>> "SH" == Shane Hathaway <shane@zope.com> writes:
>
> SH> I like the notion that OFS contains only the things you would
> SH> need to make a static web site: folders, files, and images.
> SH> Imagine people coming from other web servers and trying to
> SH> make sense of an entire object system. They need a way in.
> SH> The easiest thing to do is upload static HTML and images, and
> SH> to do that, just use OFS. OFS is the doorway from files and
> SH> directories to very simple objects. And OFS is always there
> SH> to fall back on.
>
> SH> This is one of the things that Zope 2 did right.
>
> Cool, sounds great. But is "OFS" the best way to describe the utility
> of this subdirectory? It's a mystical acronym to the uninitiated.
IMHO things that you can actually instantiate via ZopeTop and add content to
(Folders, Files, Images) should go into a Content package.
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
It doesn't bother me that people say things like
"you'll never get anywhere with this attitude".
In a few decades, it will make a good paragraph
in my biography. You know, for a laugh.
--
http://www.laranja.org/ mailto:lalo@laranja.org
pgp key: http://www.laranja.org/pessoal/pgp
Brazil of Darkness (RPG) --- http://www.BroDar.org/
Python Foundry Guide http://www.sf.net/foundry/python-foundry/