[Zope3-dev] zope3-dev proposal on changing implicitly calling

[Chris Withers]

[switching list]

Steve Alexander wrote:
>> I'm afraid I disagree. I'd prefer to see it encouraged to keep the 
>> traversal policy simple and consistent (which probably means 
>> non-configurable: think the why-did-they-do-that--because-they-could 
>> syndrome of things like Plone) and in so doing mean that people who 
>> want to use paths don't have to end up understanding how the 
>> underlying traversal components work because they all work differently...
> 
> I'm calling FUD here. If you want to discuss how Zope 3 should work, we 
> need to do it on the zope3-dev mailing list.

So now we're on the Zope 3 list, lets open up the discussion again :-)

Chris