[Zope3-dev] zope3-dev proposal on changing implicitly calling

[Steve Alexander]

Chris Withers wrote:
 >>>
>>> I'm afraid I disagree. I'd prefer to see it encouraged to keep the 
>>> traversal policy simple and consistent (which probably means 
>>> non-configurable: think the why-did-they-do-that--because-they-could 
>>> syndrome of things like Plone) and in so doing mean that people who 
>>> want to use paths don't have to end up understanding how the 
>>> underlying traversal components work because they all work 
>>> differently...

Steve Alexander wrote:
>>
>> I'm calling FUD here. If you want to discuss how Zope 3 should work, 
>> we need to do it on the zope3-dev mailing list.

Chris Withers wrote:
 >
> So now we're on the Zope 3 list, lets open up the discussion again :-)

What do you want to know about traversal in Zope 3?

--
Steve Alexander