[Zope3-dev] Inline code
Gary Poster
gary at modernsongs.com
Tue Feb 10 13:13:26 EST 2004
Do I understand correctly that in this scheme effectively each template
page would have its own local module?
Gary
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
>
>>Further, one way to make inline code portable is to treat inline code as a
>>module, rather than as a collection of anonymous code blocks. For
>>example:
>>
>><html>
>><head><title>Shane's Example</title>
>><script type="text/server-python">
>>import time
>>def showtime():
>> return time.asctime()
>></script>
>></head>
>><body>
>>Date and time: <span tal:content="code/showtime">(time)</span>.
>></body>
>></html>
>
>
> I'm surprised I received no response on this. I'll help you guys start
> debating. :-)
>
> Pros:
>
> - You can write code inline. It would replace the need for complex
> expressions.
>
> - Unlike the current script tag, moving the inline code to a separate
> module is always straightforward. Once it's in a separate module, you get
> all the manageability of Python modules.
>
> - Unlike the current script tag, we don't have to manipulate print
> statements. In fact, for the whole story to work, we might not allow
> print statements (except perhaps as a debugging tool.)
>
> Cons:
>
> - It's not like Javascript; there is no "document.write()" equivalent.
> It's a lot more like CSS, since CSS styles apply to the whole document
> regardless of what part of the document defines them.
>
> Hmm, I can't think of any more cons. :-) This seems like a big win
> overall. Maybe we could try this in Zope 2 first.
>
> Shane
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope3-dev mailing list
> Zope3-dev at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-dev
>
>
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list