[Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

[Philipp von Weitershausen]

Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On 4/23/06, Andreas Reuleaux <reuleaux at web.de> wrote:
>> Sorry, I wonder if you read my suggestion carefully. In particular
>> I suggested having a period where only the new (and ugly) statement
>> is allowed, and only after that to reintroduce the old statment
>> with a new meaning.
> 
> Yes, so you suggest that we deprecate a statement for a statement that
> we intent to deprecate. And that just makes no sense.

I agree it would be more confusing than anything else.

If people don't like the 'browser2' prefix, I'm open to other 
suggestions. For all I care, the three directives I suggested could be 
on the 'browser' namespace, only browser2:page and browser:page clash. 
So perhaps browser2:page should be named something else. I can't seem to 
come up with good alternatives, though.

Philipp