[Zope3-dev] two small bugs in zc.relationship

[Markus Kemmerling]

Certainly true. I just wanted the bug fix to stay in sync with the  
package author's coding style. He already used logical operator magic  
to mimic the '?:' ternary operator in a similar method. I myself  
prefer boring if ... else constructs.

Markus Kemmerling

Am 02.07.2007 um 14:51 schrieb Stefan H. Holek:

> As a general rule you should avoid taking the boolean value of  
> objects. You never know what the result will be and how expensive  
> the underlying operations are (e.g. computing the length of a BTree  
> can be *very* expensive).
>
> Stefan
>
>
> On 2. Jul 2007, at 14:24, Markus Kemmerling wrote:
>
>> But I wouldn't have expected a non built-in type, that *also*  
>> supports the mapping API, to be considered as `False` as long as  
>> the mapping is empty ...
>
> --
> Anything that happens, happens.  --Douglas Adams
>
>