[Zope3-dev] status of zc.page?

[Benji York]

> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Still, of course, for the bits we open source, I guess we are going to 
>> have
>> to port back to 2.3.

Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Well, there's no need if we just say that this bit requires a Zope 3.1 
> running Python 2.4; why create extra work for ourselves? 

+1

Since 3.1 will run on 2.4 anyway, and zc.page won't be in 3.1 we 
should just say that zc.page requires 2.4.  If we get overwhelming 
interest in running it on 2.3, we (or a volunteer) will back port it.

And as a side effect Martijn will get to use the decorators the right 
way. :)
-- 
Benji York
Sr. Software Engineer
Zope Corporation